Nathan Cox vs William Jansen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Cox vs W. Jansen

Nathan Cox
USA
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

William Jansen
GBR
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Cox 0 - 0 Jansen
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cox | 0 |
| Jansen | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
N. Cox vs W. Jansen H2H Profile
N. Cox vs W. Jansen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nathan Cox has won 43.62% of points on their second serve, while William Jansen has won 46.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nathan Cox, in recent form, has won 49.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while William Jansen has won 41.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.78% and 23.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nathan Cox has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas William Jansen has saved 58.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nathan Cox has won 65.00% of matches played (W/L 13/7), with William Jansen winning 52.94% (W/L 9/8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nathan Cox has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/2). William Jansen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 28/21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Nathan Cox has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.00% of matches (W/L 13/7), where as William Jansen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nathan Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 301.75 while William Jansen has played against players with an average rank of 388.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nathan Cox has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while William Jansen has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nathan Cox has converted 39.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and William Jansen has converted 22.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nathan Cox vs William Jansen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Cox 47%, Jansen 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Cox 54%, Jansen 46%.
Break Points Saved %: Cox 58%, Jansen 70%.
N. Cox Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
W. Jansen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||

N. Cox vs W. Jansen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.00% (13/7) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.05% (40/34) |
| 60.42% (29/19) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.17% (91/77) |
| 50.11% (230/229) | Games Win/Loss | 53.94% (856/731) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (28/21) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.29% (9/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 49 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 52 | Total Double Faults | 121 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:31:2 |
| 301.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.64 |
| 51% (333/658) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2853/4324) |
| 69% (230/333) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1948/2853) |
| 47% (154/325) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (758/1471) |
| 40% (23/58) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (177/395) |
| 41% (253/622) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1650/4258) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 65.00% (13/7) | Futures W/L | 58.82% (40/28) |
| 65% (13/20) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (40/73) |
| 100% (4/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 92% (12/11) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (40/34) |
| 8% (12/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (40/5) |
| 25% (8/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (34/6) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction10:30 PM 15/11/25
Prediction03:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction06:20 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico